Communications Subsystem

From SynCell
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The communications subsystem of a synthetic cell is responsible for sending and receiving signals between synthetic cells or between a synthetic cell and its environment. Inter-cell communication plays a central role in enabling modular, distributed control architectures, allowing complex functionality to be decomposed into simpler subsystems interconnected through standardized interfaces.

Communication Paradigms

A broad body of work in living cells has established multiple paradigms for intercellular communication, including quorum-sensing mechanisms[1] and engineered diffusible transcriptional activators[2][3] that now serve as design templates for synthetic cell systems. Two broad communication modalities have been demonstrated in synthetic cell contexts: diffusive signaling, in which small molecules passively spread between compartments, and message-based signaling, in which structured molecular information (typically DNA or RNA) carries the signal.

Diffusive Signaling

Diffusive signaling relies on small molecules that cross synthetic cell membranes by passive diffusion or through membrane-embedded channels such as α-hemolysin pores. The signal molecule itself carries the information: its concentration encodes the state of the sending cell, and the receiving cell responds via its internal sensing and gene expression machinery. This paradigm is closely analogous to quorum sensing in living bacteria, in which a population collectively monitors its own density through accumulation of a diffusible autoinducer.

Demonstration: Communication Between Synthetic Cell Populations (Adamala, 2017)

{Adamala et al., 2017, Figure 1}
Overview of genetic circuit interactions within and between synthetic cells. (a) Synells consist of semipermeable phospholipid vesicles encapsulating cell-free transcription–translation machinery and DNA programs. (d) Communication between synthetic-cell populations enables coupled circuit behavior via diffusible molecular signals. (e) Synthetic cells with fusogenic membranes allow staged execution of genetic programs. Adamala et al., 2017, Figure 1.

Adamala and colleagues provided one of the first demonstrations of genetic circuit-based communication between populations of synthetic cells[4]. Their system used genetic circuits encapsulated in lipid bilayer vesicles (termed "synells"). Two distinct cell populations were used: sensor synells containing IPTG and circuits to produce α-hemolysin in response to arabinose, and reporter synells containing circuits that responded to released IPTG by expressing firefly luciferase. When arabinose was present in the environment, it diffused into the sensor cells and triggered α-hemolysin expression; the resulting membrane pores released IPTG into the medium, which then entered the reporter cells and activated luciferase expression. This established a cascaded, two-population communication circuit without crosstalk between populations.


Demonstration: Quorum Sensing in Non-Living Cell Mimics (Niederholtmeyer and Devaraj, 2018)

Niederholtmeyer and Devaraj demonstrated that non-living artificial cell mimics could exchange information through a quorum-sensing-like mechanism, using cell-free gene expression systems encapsulated within porous polymer membranes[5]. The porous membranes allowed passive exchange of small signaling molecules between compartments while retaining the larger cell-free gene expression machinery, enabling population-level sensing and coordinated responses without living cells.

Message-Based Signaling

An alternative to diffusive signaling is to use structured molecular information — typically DNA or RNA strands — as the communication medium. This decouples message content from the physical transmission mechanism and allows more complex information to be exchanged, including addressable messages directed to specific receiver populations.

Demonstration: DNA-Based Cell–Cell Communication (Ortiz and Endy, 2012; Marken and Murray, 2023)

Ortiz and Endy demonstrated engineered cell–cell communication using DNA as the messaging molecule[6]. Marken and Murray extended this approach with an addressable and adaptable DNA messaging system that allows messages to be selectively routed to specific cell populations and updated dynamically[7].

Demonstration: DNA Strand-Displacement Communication Between Protocells (Joesaar et al., 2019)

Joesaar and colleagues developed a platform in which enzyme-free DNA strand-displacement circuits enabled bidirectional communication and distributed Boolean computation between protocells[8]. The use of DNA strand displacement removes the requirement for transcription and translation machinery in the communication layer itself, enabling faster signaling dynamics and reducing the metabolic load on the receiving cell's gene expression resources.

Communications in the Control Architecture

Together, diffusive and message-based communication modalities provide multiple design points for implementing distributed control architectures in synthetic cell systems. The communications subsystem interfaces directly with the Sensing Subsystem (which detects incoming signals) and the Mechanical Actuation Subsystem or gene expression outputs (which generate outgoing signals). Key design considerations include:

  • Directionality: diffusive signals are inherently broadcast; message-based signals can be addressed to specific receivers. The choice of modality affects how information flows through a multi-cell system.
  • Signal range: diffusive signals attenuate with distance, creating spatial gradients that can be exploited for positional information. Message-based signals can in principle be transmitted over longer ranges.
  • Crosstalk and orthogonality: operating multiple communication channels simultaneously requires orthogonal signal molecules or message sequences to prevent unintended cross-activation between cell populations.
  • Bandwidth and latency: gene-expression-based responses to diffusive signals are slow (minutes to hours). Faster communication may require direct molecular signaling that bypasses transcription and translation, as in the DNA strand-displacement approach.

References

  1. S. R. Scott and J. Hasty, Quorum sensing communication modules for microbial consortia. ACS Synthetic Biology 5(9):969–977, 2016.
  2. S. Regot, J. Macia, N. Conde, K. Furukawa, J. Kjellén, T. Peeters, S. Hohmann, E. de Nadal, and F. Posas, Distributed biological computation with multicellular engineered networks. Nature 469:207–211, 2011.
  3. S. Billerbeck, J. Brisbois, N. Agmon, M. Jimenez, J. Temple, M. Shen, J. D. Boeke, and V. W. Cornish, A scalable peptide–GPCR language for engineering multicellular communication. Nature Communications 9:5057, 2018. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07610-2
  4. K. P. Adamala, D. A. Martin-Alarcon, K. R. Guthrie-Honea, and E. S. Boyden, Engineering genetic circuit interactions within and between synthetic minimal cells. Nature Chemistry 9(5):431–439, 2017. DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2644
  5. H. Niederholtmeyer, C. Chaggan, and N. K. Devaraj, Communication and quorum sensing in non-living mimics of eukaryotic cells. Nature Communications 9:5027, 2018.
  6. M. E. Ortiz and D. Endy, Engineered cell–cell communication via DNA messaging. Journal of Biological Engineering 6:16, 2012.
  7. J. P. Marken and R. M. Murray, Addressable and adaptable intercellular communication via DNA messaging. Nature Communications 14:2353, 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37788-z
  8. A. Joesaar, S. Yang, B. Bögels, A. van der Linden, P. Pieters, B. V. V. S. Pavan Kumar, N. Dalchau, A. Phillips, S. Mann, and T. F. A. de Greef, DNA-based communication in populations of synthetic protocells. Nature Nanotechnology 14(4):369–378, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41565-019-0399-9